The UK’s push for the frictionless market of the Norway option, while accepting only the obligations of the Canada option, was not viable. It was a delusion, either due to ignorance or self-deception. The UK never had the same vision of the EU as the other Member States. A main reason for the UK’s accession […]
Recent PostsRole modelling Brexit? Swiss newspapers show remarkable leeway in presenting Brexit as a ‘benchmark’ for Switzerland | EU correspondents are needed to make differentiated integration accessible to the public | Is there a relationship between Facebook, fake news and support for the EU? It's complicated | The German 'traffic light' coalition: no commitment to stronger spending powers for the EU | The Wider Europe: a time for experiments |
Related PostsWhy a change in government won’t change Norway’s ambiguous EU policy | Is Next Generation EU the great leap towards a European Fiscal Union? | The Austerity Zombie rises from the dead | Why the Nordic states maintain differentiated foreign policies | The Conference on the Future of Europe: vehicle for reform versus forum for reflection? |
UACES and Ideas on Europe do not take responsibility for opinions expressed in articles on blogs hosted on Ideas on Europe. All opinions are those of the contributing authors. The content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The map in the Ideas on Europe logo is an abstract map. It does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UACES and Ideas on Europe concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
© UACES 2022